New Titans logo: evaluating the redesign against the previous identity
How to judge the new Titans logo against the previous identity: which mark is meant, fair comparison criteria, vector versus raster files, and usage rights.
Contents
The short answer is that judging the new Titans logo means comparing the official new primary mark with the official previous mark, side by side, at the same sizes and in the same colour conditions. The material behind this article does not include either version of the artwork, an announcement from the brand owner, or a date for the change. This assessment therefore cannot say what was altered or whether the redesign is an improvement. It can identify which logo you need to pin down, set out the criteria that make a comparison fair, and explain what the change means for anyone handling the vector files.
Which Titans logo is under discussion
Several unrelated brands use the Titans name, including professional and amateur sports teams, a comic-book series titled The New Titans, schools and clubs. A search for a new Titans logo can return marks from any of them, and sometimes fan-made concepts presented as if they were official. Before comparing anything, confirm three things. First, who owns the mark. Second, whether the owner has officially released the new version, as opposed to it being leaked, rumoured or fan-made. Third, which earlier logo it replaces. If these are left open, a comparison can easily set one organisation's new logo against another organisation's old one.
What a fair before-and-after comparison needs
- The new primary logo, taken from the owner's own release rather than a screenshot or social-media repost
- The previous primary logo from a comparable official source
- Any secondary marks, wordmarks or monograms that changed alongside the primary logo, since a redesign is often spread across the whole system
- Colour specifications published by the owner, if available, rather than colours sampled from compressed images
- The release date and any stated reasons for the change, so that intent can be separated from editorial interpretation
Criteria for judging the redesign
The table below sets out editorial criteria, not measurements. No testing of either logo was carried out for this article. Apply these checks once you have the official artwork for both versions.
| Criterion | What to check | Why it matters |
| Silhouette | Whether the mark is recognisable as a solid shape with no interior detail | A strong outline holds up on merchandise, signage and favicons |
| Small-size legibility | Whether fine lines, gaps and lettering survive at small sizes | Detail that fills in when reduced weakens the identity in digital use |
| One-colour version | Whether the logo works in a single colour and reversed out | Embroidery, stamping and limited-colour printing depend on it |
| Continuity | Which shapes, colours or motifs carry over from the previous identity | This shows whether the change is an evolution or a clean break |
| Colour | Whether the owner gives defined values for print and screen | Undefined colours drift between suppliers and media |
| Typography | Whether the wordmark uses custom lettering or an existing typeface | This affects consistency and licensing when the mark is reproduced |
Vector artwork, embedded images and raster previews
Most images of a new logo that circulate in news coverage and on social media are raster previews: fixed-resolution pixel images. They are fine for a first visual impression. They cannot show curve quality, anchor-point structure or how cleanly the shapes are built, so a judgement about craftsmanship based on a preview is limited.
A filename or extension does not prove that a file contains editable vector paths. A file saved as SVG, EPS, PDF or AI can hold a pasted-in pixel image instead of, or alongside, true paths. To check, open the file in a vector editor and switch to outline or wireframe view. Then select individual shapes to confirm that they are paths, look for embedded or linked image objects, and see whether the lettering is outlined or still uses live fonts that would need to be installed.
Downloading the logo is not permission to use it
Being able to download a Titans logo file, from any source, does not grant rights to modify the artwork, use it commercially or apply it to products. Team and publication logos are normally protected trademarks, and permission for anything beyond the owner's stated terms has to come from the owner. Any fonts in a wordmark may carry their own separate licence. Using the logo to report on or discuss the redesign is a different context from reproducing it on goods, but the details depend on jurisdiction and circumstances, so check specific plans with the rights holder or a qualified adviser.
What remains unconfirmed
- Which Titans organisation's redesign is meant
- Whether the new logo has been officially released and when
- What specifically changed between the previous and new marks
- Whether the owner provides official vector files, and under what terms
- Published colour values and typeface details for either version
