Contents
  1. Refresh, redesign or rebrand: what "new logo" can mean
  2. Signs an audit points toward a new logo
  3. Check what the existing artwork actually is
  4. What a new logo design should deliver
  5. Rights: download, modification and use are separate permissions
  6. Gaps in this assessment

A new logo is justified when an audit shows the current mark can no longer do its job: it fails at small sizes, cannot be reproduced cleanly in one color, no longer reflects what the business does, or exists only as files nobody can edit. If the mark still works and only its execution is dated or inconsistent, a refresh is usually the more proportionate step. Whichever route you take, the result should be delivered as genuine, editable vector master artwork plus the exports needed for everyday use.

No specific brand, logo or file set was supplied for this assessment, so it covers the general decision and the artwork checks that apply to any logo redesign. It does not include prices, timelines or performance figures.

Refresh, redesign or rebrand: what "new logo" can mean

People asking for a new logo often mean different scopes of work. Naming the scope early keeps the brief, the budget and the expected deliverables aligned.

Scope | What changes | What usually stays | Typical trigger
Refresh | Line weights, spacing, color values, cleaned-up type, simplified details | Core symbol, overall shape, name | Mark is recognizable but looks dated or reproduces poorly
Redesign | Symbol and/or wordmark are rebuilt or replaced | Brand name and broad positioning | Mark has structural problems or no longer fits the business
Rebrand | Logo, visual identity and often name, voice and positioning | Very little by default | Merger, major change in offering or audience, or a naming or trademark conflict
  • The mark becomes illegible or loses its key detail when reduced for favicons, app icons or small print.
  • It depends on gradients, shadows, photographic textures or other effects and has no workable one-color version.
  • The symbol or wordmark misrepresents what the business now does or who it serves.
  • Different versions are in circulation and nobody can identify the authoritative one.
  • No editable master exists: the only files are raster images or documents with the logo embedded as a picture.
  • There is a trademark, licensing or similarity problem with another mark.

A single item, such as missing source files, may be fixable by redrawing the existing mark as clean vector artwork rather than designing a new one. Several items together, especially problems with legibility and fit, are a stronger case for a redesign.

Check what the existing artwork actually is

Before deciding, establish whether the current logo files contain real vector artwork. Three things are often confused:

  • Vector artwork: shapes defined as editable paths and anchor points that scale without loss.
  • Embedded raster image: a bitmap placed inside a vector-capable file. It looks like a logo but pixelates when enlarged and cannot be edited as paths.
  • Raster preview: a pixel-based export or thumbnail intended for viewing, not a master file.

A file extension does not prove which of these you have. SVG, PDF, EPS and AI files can all contain embedded bitmaps. The reliable check is to open the file in a vector editor and inspect it, for example in an outline or wireframe view, to confirm the logo is made of paths rather than a single placed image. While doing so, note whether lettering is live text, which needs the original font installed, or has been converted to outlines.

What a new logo design should deliver

A finished logo is a file system as much as a graphic. A practical delivery set usually includes:

  • An editable vector master in the designer's native format, with clearly named layers or artboards.
  • A version with all text converted to outlines, so it renders correctly without the font.
  • Layout variants such as primary, horizontal or stacked, and symbol-only, where the design calls for them.
  • Color variants: full color, one color, and reversed for dark backgrounds.
  • Vector exports for use, typically SVG for screens and PDF or EPS for print workflows.
  • Raster exports such as PNG in a range of sizes for platforms that require pixel images, clearly treated as derivatives rather than masters.
  • Documented color values and the font names used, with notes on clear space and minimum size.

Rights: download, modification and use are separate permissions

Being able to download a logo file does not grant the right to alter it or use it commercially. For a new logo, confirm in writing that ownership or a suitable license for the artwork transfers to you on completion, that any fonts used are licensed for logo and commercial use, and that the mark has been checked for conflicts with existing trademarks in the markets where you operate. If a redesign is based on templates or stock elements, their license terms may restrict exclusive or trademark use.

Gaps in this assessment

Because no particular logo or brand was provided, this cannot say whether a specific mark needs replacing, what a redesign would cost, or how long it would take. Applying the checks above to the actual files and brand situation is the step that turns this general guidance into a decision.