logoredraws.com

New Logo Design: When to Redesign and When to Redraw

Redraw a logo when the design works but the files don't; redesign when the mark itself no longer fits. How to tell the difference and what each approach delivers.

Published

Contents
  1. The short answer
  2. What each approach means
  3. Signs the problem is the file, not the design
  4. How to check whether a file is truly vector
  5. Signs the design itself needs to change
  6. The middle path: redraw with documented corrections
  7. Rights, fonts and trademarks
  8. What to expect at handover
  9. Limits of this overview

The short answer

Redraw a logo when the design still works and the problem is the artwork file. Redesign it when the design itself no longer serves the brand. A faithful redraw keeps the logo looking the same and rebuilds it as clean, editable vector artwork. A redesign changes how the logo looks. Many requests for a new logo turn out to be file problems, so check the artwork before deciding the mark needs to change.

What each approach means

Faithful redrawing rebuilds an existing logo as vector paths that match the original's shapes, proportions, letterforms and colors as closely as possible. The goal is a reliable master file that scales cleanly and can be edited. It is not meant to look different.

Redesign changes the mark. That can mean a light refinement, such as simplifying detail or adjusting spacing. It can mean an evolution that keeps recognizable elements while updating the form. Or it can mean an entirely new identity. Even a small visible change moves the work out of redrawing and into redesign, so decide which one you are commissioning and say so in the brief.

Signs the problem is the file, not the design

  • The only versions available are JPG, PNG or screenshots, and they blur or pixelate when enlarged.
  • A file labeled as vector (EPS, PDF, SVG or AI) actually contains a placed photo or bitmap rather than paths.
  • The artwork was auto-traced and has wobbly curves, rounded corners that should be sharp, or far more anchor points than the shapes need.
  • Text in the logo is live type in a font nobody on the current team has, so it shifts or substitutes when the file is opened.
  • Several slightly different versions are in circulation and nobody knows which one is correct.

If the logo is still recognized, legible and appropriate, and these are the only complaints, a redraw is usually enough.

How to check whether a file is truly vector

A file extension does not tell you whether the artwork is editable vector paths. EPS, PDF and SVG files can each hold real vector shapes, an embedded raster image, or both. A PDF or EPS can also contain only a low-resolution raster preview of the artwork. Open the file in a vector editor and switch to an outline or wireframe view. Vector artwork appears as path outlines. An embedded raster appears as a single rectangle, often with an X or an empty box. If you select the logo and it behaves like one picture rather than separate shapes, it is not editable vector artwork.

In an SVG, the same difference is visible in the markup. The first example below only wraps a bitmap. The second contains actual vector geometry.

<!-- Embedded raster: not editable vector artwork -->
<svg viewBox="0 0 200 80">
  <image href="logo.png" width="200" height="80"/>
</svg>

<!-- Vector path: editable shapes -->
<svg viewBox="0 0 200 80">
  <path d="M10 70 L50 10 L90 70 Z" fill="#1A3C6E"/>
</svg>

Signs the design itself needs to change

  • Fine detail, thin strokes or small text disappear at small sizes, such as app icons, favicons or embroidery.
  • The mark does not work in a single color, so it fails on stamps, engraving or single-color print.
  • The business has changed its name, focus, audience or structure, and the logo now misrepresents it.
  • The logo is confusingly similar to another organization's mark.
  • The style reads as dated in a way that works against how the brand wants to be perceived. This is an editorial judgment, not a technical fault.

Redrawing a logo with these problems produces clean files of a design that still underperforms. In these cases a redesign, or at least a deliberate refinement, addresses the actual issue.

The middle path: redraw with documented corrections

Some projects sit between the two. A designer rebuilding a logo may notice uneven stroke weights, awkward letter spacing or curves that never quite matched. Fixing these improves the mark without changing its identity. The safest approach is to agree in advance whether such corrections are allowed. Ask the designer to deliver both a strictly faithful version and the corrected version, so the change is a choice and not an accident.

Rights, fonts and trademarks

Having a logo file is not the same as having permission to change or use it. Redrawing or redesigning your own organization's logo is normally within your control. Rebuilding another company's logo is a different matter. If you downloaded a logo from a logo library or press page, that permission to download does not by itself grant rights to alter the artwork or use the trademark. Check the owner's brand guidelines or get written permission.

Typefaces need separate attention. If a logo was set in a commercial font, rebuilding it may require a valid font license, depending on that license's terms. Converting lettering to outlines removes the dependency on installed fonts in the delivered file, but it does not by itself settle the licensing question.

A faithful redraw is intended to leave a registered mark visually unchanged. A redesign may differ enough to affect existing trademark coverage, so organizations with registered marks should get qualified legal advice before adopting a redesigned logo.

What to expect at handover

Whichever route you take, the result should be a master vector file with clean paths and any text converted to outlines. You should also receive documented color values and the variations the brand needs, such as full color, single color and reversed. Vector formats such as SVG, EPS, PDF or the native file of the design application keep the artwork scalable. PNG or JPG exports are useful for everyday digital use but are not substitutes for the master. Verify delivered vector files with the outline-view check above rather than trusting the file names.

Limits of this overview

No case-specific evidence was available for this article. It contains no figures on cost, turnaround time or how often redesigns succeed, and it does not evaluate any particular logo, designer or tool. The guidance reflects general principles of vector artwork and logo delivery. Decisions about your mark, especially legal or trademark questions, should rest on an assessment of your actual files and situation.