Contents
  1. 1. Record what the existing logo needs to do
  2. 2. Compare like with like
  3. 3. Test the smallest important use first
  4. 4. Check the logo in context
  5. 5. Review the surrounding brand system
  6. 6. Make the handoff unambiguous

A useful logo redesign starts with a problem you can describe. Perhaps the wordmark becomes difficult to read in a navigation bar, the symbol loses its shape at small sizes, or the files supplied to your team are inconsistent. Write that problem down before changing the artwork. It gives you a way to judge the result beyond whether the new version feels more fashionable.

This checklist is for comparing and preparing a redesign. It does not replace original design work, permission to use the artwork, or a proper vector master. Use files you own or are authorized to edit.

1. Record what the existing logo needs to do

Collect the places where the logo actually appears: a website header, a social profile, a small product label, a slide deck or a shop sign. For each, note the available space and background. A wide wordmark and a square avatar solve different layout problems; one export is unlikely to suit both.

Choose two or three concrete goals. Examples include “the name remains readable in the mobile header,” “the symbol has a useful single-color version,” and “the favicon is distinguishable without the wordmark.” Keep recognizability on the list if continuity with an existing identity matters.

2. Compare like with like

Put the original and proposed versions on the same canvas with comparable apparent size. Match the backgrounds, centering and surrounding space. A much larger new logo can look stronger simply because of the presentation.

The Before/After demo gallery shows this comparison approach using fictional brands; it does not accept your own image pair. Apply the same approach to your files in your design workspace. Look at one change at a time: silhouette, spacing, lettering or color. Record the improvement and its tradeoff. A simpler mark may survive reduction better while losing a detail that people associate with the brand.

3. Test the smallest important use first

Reduce the artwork to its intended display size and inspect it without zooming in. Check enclosed spaces in letters, thin strokes, narrow gaps and small detached elements. If details merge, consider a simpler small-size variant instead of repeatedly sharpening a raster export.

The image resize and conversion tool helps prepare comparison files. Resizing can reveal a problem, but enlarging a small image does not recreate missing artwork. Keep the original master separate from test exports.

4. Check the logo in context

A logo on a blank artboard can behave differently in a layout. Try the Mockup Preview tool to compare placements on a business card, sign and screen. Use the same placement for competing versions so the scene does not decide the comparison for you.

Review light and dark backgrounds. Notice whether the mark needs an approved reversed version or more clear space. These browser previews help with composition; they are not a print proof, a material simulation or a promise about the final size and color of a physical sign.

5. Review the surrounding brand system

Check the text and controls that will sit beside the logo, not just the mark itself. A color that works as a large decorative accent may be unsuitable for small labels. Our guide to building a logo palette and checking text contrast explains how to separate those decisions.

For lettering changes, compare spacing inside the actual brand name. Review the logo typography and spacing checklist before approving a wordmark solely from a large preview.

6. Make the handoff unambiguous

  • Identify the editable master and the person responsible for it.
  • Separate light-background, dark-background and single-color variants.
  • Label the export format and pixel dimensions where relevant.
  • Include a small-use symbol or favicon when the full lockup is unsuitable.
  • Keep a short record of the problem solved and any remaining limitations.

Finish by repeating the original use cases. If the new mark meets those needs, the decision has a stronger basis than a side-by-side preference alone. For delivery choices, see which logo file format to use.