Contents
  1. What this audit covers
  2. How to use these test cases
  3. Test cases for common logo mistakes
  4. 1. Mark and wordmark do not survive reduction
  5. 2. Contrast fails on light and dark grounds
  6. 3. Color is specified as screen RGB only
  7. 4. Artwork is a raster image inside a vector wrapper
  8. 5. Type is live, missing, or illegally outlined
  9. 6. Geometry is optically uneven
  10. 7. Construction is overcomplicated
  11. 8. Clear space and lockups are undefined
  12. 9. The file is not actually editable
  13. 10. Legal and usage limits are treated as design polish
  14. A compact pass-fail sheet
  15. What to do with a failed case
  16. Gaps in this audit

What this audit covers

This piece is a design audit of vector logo artwork. The question is which checks you should run on a logo file so common mistakes show up before delivery, print, or reuse. The asset under discussion is the working logo artwork itself: typically an editable vector master plus any raster previews or lockups that travel with it. It is not a brand-strategy review and not a claim that any one file has already been tested.

A filename or extension such as SVG, AI, EPS, or PDF does not prove the file contains editable vector paths. A document can wrap a placed bitmap, outline nothing useful, or flatten live type. Treat format as a hint. Confirm structure by inspecting paths, type, and embedded images. Permission to download a logo is also separate from permission to modify the artwork, embed the fonts, or use the trademark.

How to use these test cases

Each case is a pass or fail inspection, not a measured lab result. No scores, timings, or sample sizes are supplied here. Where a check depends on software behavior, treat it as an editorial judgment about what to look for, not a documented capability of a named tool. Run the cases on the master vector file first, then on any raster preview you actually ship, because a clean preview can hide a broken master and a clean master can still fail as a flattened export.

Test cases for common logo mistakes

1. Mark and wordmark do not survive reduction

Place the full lockup at the smallest size you expect in use: favicon, app icon, embroidered chest mark, or footer. Hairline strokes, thin counters, and tightly spaced letters that look refined at artboard scale often collapse. Fail the case if interior shapes fill in, strokes drop out, or the mark becomes a blob. Vector paths scale without pixelation; they do not automatically stay legible.

2. Contrast fails on light and dark grounds

Drop the same artwork on white, black, a mid-tone, and a busy photograph. A logo that only works on a white square is incomplete. Fail if the mark needs an unplanned holding shape, if pale fills vanish on light fields, or if dark strokes disappear on dark fields. If a one-color version is required, this case includes that version, not only the full-color master.

3. Color is specified as screen RGB only

Record how color is defined in the file: spot, process CMYK, RGB, or named swatches. A logo that exists only as RGB hex values will shift in print. Fail if there is no documented one-color or two-color fallback, if gradients are the only way the mark reads, or if adjacent hues are so close that they merge when converted. Do not treat an on-screen match as proof of print match; that would be an invented measurement.

4. Artwork is a raster image inside a vector wrapper

Select the mark and inspect whether you have paths, or a placed PNG, JPEG, or other bitmap. Embedded rasters enlarge with jagged edges, cannot take a clean spot color, and block later edits. A vector preview thumbnail is not the same as vector artwork. Fail if the primary identity is a bitmap, if effects have been rasterized in place, or if tracing produced noisy, uneditable outlines that only look vector at a glance.

5. Type is live, missing, or illegally outlined

Check whether the wordmark is live type, outlined type, or a mix. Live type without embedded or packaged fonts will substitute on another machine. Outlined type is safer for lockup delivery and harder to edit later. Fail if fonts are neither packaged nor outlined, if a system font was used as if it were a custom wordmark, or if you assume you may modify or redistribute a font simply because it appears in a downloadable logo. Font licenses and trademark licenses are separate from file access.

6. Geometry is optically uneven

Align to a grid, then look without the grid. Circles that are mathematically equal can look smaller than squares; strokes that are the same weight can look heavier on curves. Fail if spacing between letters is visibly uneven, if optical alignment was skipped around round or pointed forms, or if the mark sits off-center in its intended clear space. This is a visual judgment, not a numeric tolerance.

7. Construction is overcomplicated

Count distinct shapes, stroke weights, effects, and overlapping fills. Logos that rely on many stacked effects, inner glows, or photographic texture are fragile in one-color print, sign vinyl, and embroidery. Fail if you cannot redraw the idea at a glance, if removing a gradient destroys recognition, or if the file contains unused hidden layers that will confuse the next editor.

8. Clear space and lockups are undefined

A master mark without a clear-space rule and without horizontal and stacked lockups will be cropped, stretched, or butted against other graphics. Fail if the only file is a tight crop with no padding, if icon and wordmark have no approved relationship, or if social-avatar and wide-header crops were never drawn. Absence of a guidelines sheet is a gap; do not invent proportions that were never specified.

9. The file is not actually editable

Attempt the edits a production artist needs: recolor, isolate the icon, change the wordmark, export one color. Fail if paths are expanded into unmanageable fragments, if clipping masks hide the real geometry, if transparency flattening has merged the mark into a background, or if the only available file is a flattened PDF page or a screenshot. Editability is a property of the artwork structure, not of the download button.

Confirm who owns the mark, whether third-party symbols or clip-art shapes are inside it, and whether you may alter it. A downloaded logo pack can still be trademarked, font-licensed, or restricted to unmodified use. Fail if the artwork includes another company’s mark, if you plan to recolor or redraw without rights, or if a “free download” is taken as a license to manufacture, sell, or register the design. This case is about permission, not aesthetics.

A compact pass-fail sheet

Test caseWhat you inspectTypical fail
ReductionSmallest real sizeCounters close, strokes vanish
ContrastLight, dark, busy groundsNeeds an unplanned box
ColorSwatches and one-color fallbackRGB-only, gradient-dependent
Vector vs rasterPaths versus placed imagesBitmap inside a vector file
TypeLive, outlined, packaged fontsMissing fonts or unlicensed outlines
GeometrySpacing and optical alignmentUneven gaps, tilted lockup
ComplexityShapes, effects, hidden layersCannot reproduce in one color
LockupsClear space and crop variantsOnly a tight crop exists
EditabilityRecolor, isolate, exportFlattened or fragmented paths
RightsModify, font, trademarkDownload treated as a usage license

What to do with a failed case

Fix the master vector, then regenerate previews. Do not repair only the PNG. If the fail is structural (embedded raster, uneditable outlines, missing fonts), replace the file rather than tracing a preview. If the fail is visual (contrast, reduction, spacing), simplify geometry and add the missing one-color and inverted versions. If the fail is legal, stop using the artwork until rights are clear; redrawing a restricted mark does not create permission.

Gaps in this audit

No specific logo, vendor file, or software version was supplied, so these cases are a general inspection list rather than results for a named asset. No print proofs, accessibility contrast ratios, embroidery stitch counts, or browser-rendering tests are documented here. If you need those, run them on the actual file and record the method; do not treat this article as a substitute for that evidence.