IBM's New Logo: How to Evaluate It Against the Previous Design
A practical comparison guide for evaluating IBM's refreshed logo against the previous design using structured visual checks.
Before You Start
You need two image files: the previous IBM logo and the new IBM logo. Prepare them as high-resolution PNG files if possible. The comparison will be more accurate if both images have a similar canvas size, background, and orientation. For an objective review, place both logos at the same displayed width on screen. If you are using image tools, perform the process locally on your device. Do not upload the source files to a service unless the tool explicitly says it transmits images.
Step-by-Step Instructions
1) Open the previous logo and the new logo in separate image viewers or side-by-side in an editing app. Use the same zoom percentage for both. If the two assets do not share proportions, scale only the display size, not the original files.
2) Apply a grayscale view or desaturate both images temporarily. A black-and-white check helps you compare layout, weight, and shape without color influencing the first impression. Save a note about which forms are retained, removed, or redrawn.
3) Switch to a small preview size. Resize both images to roughly 24 or 32 pixels in height. Check if the core mark remains identifiable. If the new logo loses clarity earlier than the old one, that is a practical legibility limitation, not a service failure.
4) Use a color picker or a palette extraction tool on both files. Record the main color values. Compare whether the new design introduces a new palette, changes the contrast, or removes a previously used accent.
5) Overlay a grid on both assets. Compare horizontal and vertical alignment, spacing, and the relationship between any text and the symbol. If the new logo uses a different typeface, note whether the letterforms are wider, narrower, heavier, or more geometric.
Check the Output
Your evaluation should produce a short set of notes, not a single verdict. Confirm that you have checked the following: shape preservation in grayscale, legibility at a small size, palette change, and typographic difference. If you exported a comparison image, verify that both logos are visible at equal scale and that no source file was overwritten. Do not treat a visual impression as a measured result unless you recorded the exact color values, size, or spacing.
Common Problems and Next Steps
If the new logo appears blurry in a screenshot, check whether the source image was upscaled. Upscaling does not add missing detail. If the two files use different backgrounds, place each on the same neutral canvas before comparing. When a paler logo disappears on a light page, test the same asset on a dark background. This does not mean the logo is broken; it may mean the new design depends on a specific context.
If you need to prepare the logo for reuse, resize from the highest-quality source and avoid repeated JPEG exports. For a more practical review, place the new logo in the same mockup scenes as the previous design. Compare both in a small header slot and on a narrow mobile layout. Record what changed, what improved, and what remains the same.