Contents
  1. Before you start
  2. Step-by-step instructions
  3. Check the output
  4. Common problems and next steps

Before you start

Treat a logo history review as a visual comparison, not as proof of brand identity ownership or current usage rights. Gather clean images of the marks you want to compare, ideally with similar framing, background, and approximate size. This process can be done locally in the browser using your own image files; no upload service is required.

Step-by-step instructions

  • Open a single workspace where both images are visible side by side.
  • Align the older and newer marks at roughly the same height so changes in shape are easier to see.
  • Compare the outer silhouette first, then look at internal details such as letter spacing, counters, curves, and terminal shapes.
  • Note changes in color, contrast, and whether the mark works on both light and dark backgrounds.
  • Scale the comparison down to a small size, such as a favicon or profile image, to see which details remain legible.
  • If you have vector files, open them in an editor and inspect the actual paths rather than relying on a raster preview.

Check the output

A complete review should let you describe what changed and where it changed. Check that the comparison uses images of sufficient resolution, because blurred samples can make small spacing differences invisible. The result is a set of observations about visual changes; it does not verify which mark is currently official or whether a file is original.

Common problems and next steps

If the marks appear inconsistent, the likely cause is mismatched source quality, scaling, or color rendering rather than a change in the design itself. Replace poor samples before drawing conclusions. For small digital uses, test the mark at 16, 32, and 48 pixels and compare contrast against representative backgrounds. Keep the original files separate from edited exports so the review can be repeated if a better source becomes available.